ASIC upgrades MIS custody approach

retail-investors/compliance/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/parliamentary-joint-committee/

22 November 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The collapse of Opes Prime and the events around the loss of investor funds from Trio/Astarra have had their corollary in updated regulatory guidance from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) impacting custodians and Managed Investment Schemes (MISs).

The updated ASIC guidance directly acknowledged the rapidly changing environment impacting custodians but also the collapse of Trio Capital and the findings of the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) which reviewed that collapse.

The ASIC explanation noted the PJC's discussion of the ‘expectation gap' between the custodian's obligations and the public's expectation of them.

"We understand this gap arises because of a misunderstanding by retail investors about what custodians actually do (act only on authorised instructions from their client or their client's agent); and what an investor might expect them to do (have any investment decision-making responsibility or oversight/supervisory functions of their own)," the regulator said.

"Given the industry changes and the PJC's focus on custody, we recognised a corresponding need to review and update our guidance," ASIC said.

It said that in developing its final position, it had considered the regulatory and financial impact of its proposals and had sought to strike an appropriate balance between promoting confidence and not imposing consequent undue cost on the sector.

ASIC said it was looking to promote confidence in the MIS and custodial industry by ensuring that the assets held by asset holders — comprising responsible entities, custodians and sub-custodians — "were held in ways that will minimise the risks to those assets" and via appropriate regulation of asset holders.

However it said wanted to achieve this without unduly increasing the burden on the industry through increased costs of compliance and ultimately investors.

In doing so, ASIC threw up two options — the status quo or a second, preferred option, which involved retaining key aspects of its current regulatory approach and strengthening its regulatory approach "where warranted to address key existing and emerging issues and risks in the industry while ensuring efficient operational arrangements exist for holding and dealing with client assets, including scheme property".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS