ASIC makes first civil DDO action against financial product distributor

tmd DDO ASIC

16 December 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced its first civil penalty action against a distributor of financial products in the Federal Court for alleged breaches of the design and distribution obligations (DDO).   

Firstmac Limited distributed term deposits and other investment products, including interests in Firstmac High Livez (High Livez), a registered managed investment scheme.  

ASIC alleged that in marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, Firstmac failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the product was distributed in accordance with the target market determination.  

ASIC also alleged in its action that Firstmac sent High Livez material to 817 Firstmac term deposit customers between 5 October, 2021 and 9 September, 2022.

By adopting a cross-selling strategy of marketing and distributing High Livez to term deposit holders, there was a likelihood that those customers would be outside the High Livez target market, because:  

  • Unlike Firstmac’s term deposits which were guaranteed by the Commonwealth Government in the amount up to $250,000 per account, High Livez was not a capital guaranteed product. The TMD indicated that customers seeking a capital guarantee were not in the target market; and
  • The investment timeframes for term deposits ranged from 30 days to two years whereas the recommended investment timeframe for High Livez was a minimum of three years up to five years. The TMD indicated that customers seeking an investment timeframe of two years or less were not in the target market. 

ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court, said: “ASIC is concerned that Firstmac’s term deposit customers were exposed to the risk that they might obtain a financial product that was not appropriate to their needs and objectives. 

“Under the DDO, issuing and distributing financial products now requires a consumer-first mindset with genuine consideration of the likely objectives, financial situation and needs of consumers being targeted.”

ASIC was seeking declarations and pecuniary penalties from the Court.   

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

6 days 22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS