Are fees too high?
The majority of Australian active managers might be charging fees that are too high and smart beta investments strategies will continue to disrupt the active management, according to VanEck’s analysis.
The report, entitled “When are fees too high? The potential impact of smart beta to disrupt active Australian equity strategies”, claimed that most Australian equity funds should be charging between 0.35 per cent and 0.65 per cent per annum, as most of their performance could be explained by factors which were also used in smart beta strategies.
“Only those active managers who can demonstrate identifiable and persistent ‘real alpha’ will prevail,” Russel Chesler, VanEck’s director – investments, said.
“Australian equity managers that continue to offer benchmark-like performance for high fees face some hard decisions. They must evolve to survive.”
According to Chesler, active managers needed to better differentiate themselves and provide what smart beta could not.
“Of this differentiation can’t be achieved, the investors will continue to question the fees they are being charged,” he concluded.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Selfwealth has provided an update on the status of its scheme implementation deed with Bell Financial Group as well as whether rival bidder Svava remains in the picture.
Magellan Financial Group has reported its first half FY25 results while appointing a new chief financial officer and promoting Sophia Rahmani to chief executive.
Schroders Australia has launched two active ETFs and plans to further expand its listed range over the year ahead.
Platform Netwealth has reported its financial results for the first half of FY25, reporting an 80 per cent increase in net flows, with its CEO viewing a “huge opportunity” from private assets.
