APRA hedging on hedge funds

hedge funds superannuation funds australian prudential regulation authority executive general manager government

18 June 2010
| By By Mike Taylor |

At the same time as regulators in the US and Europe have moved to intensify their scrutiny on hedge funds, Australia’s major prudential regulator has admitted it does not possess clear details about the degree to which superannuation funds are exposed to hedge funds.

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has admitted to a Parliamentary Committee that it has not specifically defined what constitutes a hedge fund investment and therefore cannot determine with certainty the level of exposure of individual funds.

Addressing the Senate Economic Committee, APRA executive general manager Keith Chapman said the question of determining the level of exposure to hedge funds had been an issue for debate within the regulator for many years.

"One of the difficulties we have always had with hedge funds is how you define them," he said. "For part of our data collection on super we have a category called ‘other’."

However Chapman admitted that the ‘other’ category "might in many cases include hedge funds, but some of them may also be in listed equities. Some hedge funds are listed".

He said that APRA did not believe the overall level of exposure to ‘other’ was very high.

"When we do individual fund reviews and examinations we look at what their investment portfolios are … but I am not aware of any significant number of superannuation funds that we believe have a significant exposure to hedge funds," Chapman said.

While noting that APRA had "one example which has failed where there was a lot invested in hedge funds", Chapman said that across the board APRA was not seeing significant hedge fund investment.

He said he would view a significant exposure as being something above 5 per cent.

"But I think we also need to look at this issue from the perspective of: what is a significant exposure for a fund versus what is a significant exposure for an investment option," Chapman said.

He said APRA’s policy over many years had been to allow investment choice, "and we do not collect superannuation investment option level data at this stage".

"One of our proposals is to do so in the future. That is something we are very keen to do. The Cooper Review has this as part of their examination. We have slowed our process down to see what comes out of Cooper. Subject to Cooper not recommending otherwise and the Government not deciding otherwise, we would definitely be intending to expand our superannuation data collection to include investment option level, because that is where it starts to become an issue."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 2 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

3 days 6 hours ago