Advisers neglecting active ETFs as launches fail to see momentum

ETFs active ETF VanEck

9 August 2024
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

While ETFs are growing in popularity with advisers, there is a growing divide in demand between those which are index and active, according to VanEck.

The exchange-traded product (ETP) industry reached $215 billion in July and is forecast to reach $230 billion by the end of the year.

But a growing divide is emerging between the demand for those which are index-tracking products and those which are active ETFs.

During 2023, active ETFs reported $1 billion in outflows, although this was primarily driven by outflows from Magellan Global Fund (Open Class) (Managed Fund) which lost $2.5 billion.

Some 18 active ETFs have been launched since the start of the year but have only seen $36 million in net flows, representing just 0.3 per cent of total ETF flows. Out of the total 119 active ETFs available in the Australian marketplace, 64 have less than $50 million.

The attraction of launching an active ETF is for asset managers to broaden their investor reach with more investors, such as those in self-managed super funds (SMSFs) able to easily access the funds in an ETF format.

Active ETFs launched this year include a range of four active ETFs from Fidelity, an active bond ETF from Franklin Templeton, and two systematic active ETFs from Macquarie.

Arian Neiron, chief executive and managing director for Asia Pacific at VanEck, said: “While index-tracking ETFs are seeing unbated growth from new investors and existing investors increasing their allocations, it is a different story for the active ETFs listed by fund managers. 

“There are 119 active ETFs listed in Australia, out of 386 total ETPs. However, despite making up 30 per cent of the industry in terms of numbers, active ETFs only hold 21 per cent in terms of funds under management (FUM). There have also been an increasing number of active ETF closures.”

Neiron said the lack of strong flows into active vehicles demonstrated that product providers shouldn’t just replicate existing unlisted funds and should be a new, attractive offering for advisers. 

“Not all ETFs are alike and Australian investors are not convinced at the proposition.

“It is understandable that many active fund managers have seen the growth in the ETP industry and think that simply participating will result in flows rather than assessing the sustainability of their strategies in light of persistency of performance, lack of transparency and higher fees.”

If demand did not increase, he said, this could lead to a higher number of fund closures rather than launches.

“There is a growing likelihood of potential delistings as many active ETFs remain at unviable FUM from lack of flows.” 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 month 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 months 1 week ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

6 days 1 hour ago

Lonsec has appointed a new chief executive for its research and ratings division as Mike Wright takes up a new role in light of the acquisition of Evidentia Group by Lons...

1 month ago

The Financial Services and Credit Panel has cancelled the registration of an NSW adviser for two years as it felt he displayed a ‘level of incompetence’ in providing advi...

1 month ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS