Active funds underperform: Stockspot
The great debate between active versus passive funds had strengthened, as 77 per cent of Australian active managed funds had underperformed against the index, over a five-year period.
Such was the opinion of Stockspot founder and chief executive, Chris Brycki, who added that even in the United States, 88 per cent of managed funds had underperformed.
It was a poor consistent trend that would continue this year, so advisers needed to do their homework, he said.
"There are so many fund managers competing. It's a difficult equation. Over the last 20 years, the amount of fund managers had doubled, but that doesn't mean that those fund managers can double the market," he said.
The issue was that the fund manager market was saturated.
"They can't [all] beat each other, [possibly why] there had been a lot of money going out of the active market and into exchange traded funds (ETFs)," he said.
"If we put our client's money in active funds, we would be actively losing money for them," he said.
Interestingly, those active funds managers who also recently did well, tended to do poorly going forward, another reason why it was difficult to pick an active fund manager, he said.
Recommended for you
Bennelong Funds Management chief executive John Burke has told Money Management that the firm is seeking to invest in boutiques in two specific asset classes as it identifies gaps in its product range.
Responsible investment performance concerns have lessened as the market hits $1.6 trillion in AUM, according to RIAA’s annual report, but greenwashing fears among asset managers are on the rise.
Research by Morningstar has found fixed income funds are bucking a general trend around managed fund fee dispersion with a smaller fee dispersion compared to equity ones.
As investors seek to diversify their portfolios, the naming of bond labels has broadened out to include green, social and impact bonds, according to the annual RIAA report.
