Active funds underperform: Stockspot



The great debate between active versus passive funds had strengthened, as 77 per cent of Australian active managed funds had underperformed against the index, over a five-year period.
Such was the opinion of Stockspot founder and chief executive, Chris Brycki, who added that even in the United States, 88 per cent of managed funds had underperformed.
It was a poor consistent trend that would continue this year, so advisers needed to do their homework, he said.
"There are so many fund managers competing. It's a difficult equation. Over the last 20 years, the amount of fund managers had doubled, but that doesn't mean that those fund managers can double the market," he said.
The issue was that the fund manager market was saturated.
"They can't [all] beat each other, [possibly why] there had been a lot of money going out of the active market and into exchange traded funds (ETFs)," he said.
"If we put our client's money in active funds, we would be actively losing money for them," he said.
Interestingly, those active funds managers who also recently did well, tended to do poorly going forward, another reason why it was difficult to pick an active fund manager, he said.
Recommended for you
Blackwattle Investment Partners has hired a management trio from First Sentier Investors – who departed amid the closure of four investment teams last year – to run its first equity income offering.
Private markets manager Fortitude Investment Partners has launched an evergreen small-cap private equity fund.
After passing $300 billion in funds under management, Betashares is forecasting the Australian ETF industry could reach $500 billion by the end of 2028.
Ausbil is to expand its active ETF range with two ASX-listed launches, one focusing on global small caps and one on listed infrastructure.