Zenith to provide voting guidance to financial advisers
Zenith has announced it will now provide formal recommendations on how financial advisers should vote in the best interests of their clients on investment matters that require an investor vote.
The growth in investment vehicles has underpinned an increase in investment managers requiring unit holders to approve material changes, such as changes to the investment manager, strategy, fees, and for listed vehicles, M&A activity, the investment research provider said.
Zenith said the market has now reached a tipping point where advisers are increasingly being asked by their clients which way they should vote for a proposed change, often with limited time to decide and with extensive documentation to read.
Citing an example, Zenith said WAM Capital’s current bidder’s statement for Wealth Defender Equities is an 84-page document that advisers need to absorb and interpret before deciding if the move is in the best interests of their client base.
They will then need to decide what decision will be best for individual clients once the voting results are formalised, Zenith said.
Zenith managing partner David Wright said while the research provider has provided voting advice on a case-by-case basis for many years, it recognised the need for Zenith to fully commit to this pledge in supporting the best interest duty of its adviser clients.
“Our goal is to free up time for advisers and equip them with the tools to make an informed decision for their clients,” Wright said.
Zenith said it is currently preparing a voting recommendation for its advice client base covering the Wealth Defender Equities deal.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
