You’re biased, advisers told

financial planners commissions financial advisers financial planning industry financial advice fund manager

17 September 2002
| By George Liondis |

An allianceof high-net-worth investors has launched a stinging criticism of the quality of the financial advice they receive and accused financial planners of being tainted by their association to banks and funds management institutions.

The Australian Investor’s Association (AIA), an alliance of some 1,100 mostly high-net-worth investors, will release the inaugural survey of its members’ views on financial advisers this week, painting a largely unfavourable picture for a financial planning industry owned increasingly by big financial institutions.

The survey, conducted by polling 320 of the association’s members in June and July this year, found that 99 per cent believed financial planners who were owned by a fund manager or bank were more likely to recommend that institution’s products over all other investments.

An overwhelming majority of respondents, 95 per cent in fact, also believed the advice they received from financial planners was heavily influenced by ‘soft-dollar’ inducements paid by institutions to advisers.

The president of the AIA, Bob Andrews, says his members are experienced investors, with a strong history of contact with financial planners.

Some 68 per cent of the association’s investors have more than $500,000 in investable assets, excluding the family home, while 16 per cent have more than $2 million to invest.

“Our members have got a better and broader knowledge of investing than the average fellow on the street and this is what they are thinking [about financial advisers],” Andrews says.

Andrews says the growing link between financial planners and large financial institutions would make it increasingly difficult for high-net-worth investors to receive the financial advice they were looking for.

According to the AIA survey, up to 80 per cent of investors view independence as the most important factor in choosing an adviser.

However, AIA members saved some of their more cutting criticism for trailing commissions paid by product providers to planners.

Of those members surveyed, almost 60 per cent indicated they were unhappy with the trailing commissions advisers received.

“Our members are well aware of trailing commissions and their objection to them is not going to go away,” Andrews says.

“People are having great difficulties finding an adviser who they think is being honest and professional with them.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS