Would small IFAs be better off on salary?
The days of small independent financial advisers (IFAs) turning over less than $250,000 may be numbered with dealer group authorised representative costs rising in the face of increased regulation and associated overheads.
That is the assessment of former dealer group head, Paul Harding-Davis who said that many smaller IFAs with relatively low turnovers might be better off becoming salaried advisers from both a financial and risk perspective.
Harding-Davis’s comments came amid reports that a number of dealer groups were signalling that authorised representative costs would be rising to as high $80,000 a year to cover increasing regulatory compliance costs, professional indemnity (PI) insurance and access to planning software such as X-plan.
He said that while some dealer groups were already charging as much as $80,000 a year, he believed that costs around $65,000 were more common.
However, material developed by Viridian after it acquired much of the Westpac planning business pointed to a practice fee of $48,000 a year, together with an authorised representative fee of $22,000 a year for the first to authorised representatives and $15,000 a year for each subsequent authorised representative.
The Veridian material suggested that this meant that a financial planning practice with four authorised representatives would be paying a total of around $122,000 a year.
However discussion of the rising authorised representative costs have come at the same time as the Commonwealth Bank has confirmed a round of adviser and advice-related redundancies within Commonwealth Financial Planning.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
