Woman charged after lying to ASIC
A former director of Progressive Investment Securities has been convicted on nine charges of making false statements under oath to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Elizabeth Enares, of Pyrmont in New South Wales, was convicted in the Downing Centre Local Court on charges relating to an examination of Enares by ASIC officers during an investigation of individuals associated with Capital Investment Group (Australia) (CIG) and Progressive Investment Securities.
This investigation concerned the unlawful provision of financial services to a number of investors, who were enticed into investing in securities known as ORB 1, ORB 2 and OMIP 15 — 7 through the use of Macquarie Bank Margin Lending.
The investors were required to enter into agreements with Macquarie Bank for up to $300,000 in margin loans on each product. Many of these loans are now in default.
Enares was charged with making false statements during the examination, denying that her handwriting appeared on a number of documents including loan and product applications, which had been submitted to Macquarie Bank for approval.
Enares was sentenced to 400 hours community service.
“Lying to ASIC during a formal examination is no light matter and today’s outcome shows that such behaviour will be pursued, and is regarded seriously by the courts,” said ASIC executive director of enforcement Jan Redfern.
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions prosecuted the matter.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.