Why we did not act on Storm - ASIC chairman
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chairman Tony D’Aloisio (pictured) has sought to defend the regulator from criticism directed at it by retail investors amid the fallout from the global financial crisis (GFC).
Addressing a meeting in Sydney, D’Aloisio claimed the ultimate risk for the success or failure of an investment was a matter for the market, with shareholders and underwriters and other investors carrying that risk as they managed it through such strategies as asset diversification and assessing risk-reward premiums.
“This system and approach was well understood by institutional investors, but [less so] by retail investors,” he said. “As a result, some retail investors have been disappointed at ASIC’s performance.”
However D’Aloisio claimed that at the heart of such disappointment was “an expectation gap in risk taking”.
“There is an expectation that ASIC should have prevented some of the corporate collapses that occurred during the GFC and, once the losses occurred, ASIC should have more quickly recovered money and punished wrongdoing,” he said.
D’Aloisio said the challenge for the regulator was to make clear just what it could and could not do.
“For example, you get with the benefit of hindsight calls that ASIC was aware that Storm Financial was in the market and we should have closed it down,” he said.
“This disregards just what powers ASIC has,” D’Aloisio said. “At the height of the stock market, investors with margin loans were in the ‘black’. How would they have reacted to ASIC (if we had the power, which we do not) seeking to close them down?”
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
AZ NGA’s CEO has unpacked how its recent $345 million debt facility from Barings will accelerate its advice network’s growth ambitions, and allow its largest firms to access a greater source of funding.
Research by Colonial First State has found women are reluctant to make retirement preparations, despite 62 per cent saying they feel that they are unable to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Managed accounts saw net inflows of $14.3 billion in the six months to 31 December, according to the latest IMAP FUM census.
The increased bids for Insignia from Bain and CC Capital value the company at $3.3 billion, while there is still a possibility for competing bids from rival players such as Brookfield.
