Why we did not act on Storm - ASIC chairman

retail investors institutional investors australian securities and investments commission chairman margin loans global financial crisis storm financial stock market

1 December 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chairman Tony D’Aloisio (pictured) has sought to defend the regulator from criticism directed at it by retail investors amid the fallout from the global financial crisis (GFC).

Addressing a meeting in Sydney, D’Aloisio claimed the ultimate risk for the success or failure of an investment was a matter for the market, with shareholders and underwriters and other investors carrying that risk as they managed it through such strategies as asset diversification and assessing risk-reward premiums.

“This system and approach was well understood by institutional investors, but [less so] by retail investors,” he said. “As a result, some retail investors have been disappointed at ASIC’s performance.”

However D’Aloisio claimed that at the heart of such disappointment was “an expectation gap in risk taking”.

“There is an expectation that ASIC should have prevented some of the corporate collapses that occurred during the GFC and, once the losses occurred, ASIC should have more quickly recovered money and punished wrongdoing,” he said.

D’Aloisio said the challenge for the regulator was to make clear just what it could and could not do.

“For example, you get with the benefit of hindsight calls that ASIC was aware that Storm Financial was in the market and we should have closed it down,” he said.

“This disregards just what powers ASIC has,” D’Aloisio said. “At the height of the stock market, investors with margin loans were in the ‘black’. How would they have reacted to ASIC (if we had the power, which we do not) seeking to close them down?”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 1 day ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 7 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 22 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

1 day 2 hours ago