Why has the adviser exam fee jumped to $1,500?

ASIC exam FASEA costs

13 January 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

ASIC has clarified why the cost of sitting the financial adviser exam has increased from $573 in 2020 to $1,500.

When the financial adviser exam was run in 2020 under the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA), the cost was $540 plus GST.

When it was taken over by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the cost increased to $973.

If an adviser wanted an answer re-marked, this would cost $218. Advisers also needed to be registered as a relevant provider and pay a $95 fee.

However, for the 2023 exam dates, the costs had risen yet again to $1,500 per exam sitting.

This was despite the exam moving to an online-only format this year compared to in-person ones.

A spokesperson for ASIC told Money Management the costs of the exam were set by the Government and had risen as a result of the Corporations (Fees) Amendment (Exam Fees) Regulations 2022 in late 2022.

The next exam would be held on 16 February and bookings were open until 30 January.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by LA on Fri, 2023-01-13 09:09

Price gouging at its worst. That's all ASIC is good at, extortionate fees for everything and no service.

Submitted by Ken on Fri, 2023-01-13 10:37

Why don’t you just say You don’t want any old advisers

Submitted by Funny on Fri, 2023-01-13 11:11

Laura, if you are asking a question, perhaps Incompetence or Corruption accounts for the price rise? Suggest you consider becoming a Journalist and find out - or perhaps not?

Submitted by Anon on Mon, 2023-01-16 15:13

So what has been the benefit of the Adviser exam??

Submitted by Anon on Mon, 2023-01-16 15:15

Since giving advisers an exemption to having degree, if they have been in the industry for 10 years, I don't see what the benefit of the Adviser exam was?? It won't help any client.

Submitted by Suqeaky'21 on Wed, 2023-02-01 18:22

Monopolistic arrogance and 'fee for no service' right there. Shameful that a govt clerical department can get away with riding rough-shot over advisers just trying to do their job for their clients. Just get bloody govt in all its forms OUT OF THE DAMN WAY!

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 1 day ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

5 days 22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS