Why did the RBA opt for a 0.25% rise?
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has offered insight into its decision to raise rates by 0.25% at the last meeting.
At the minutes of the meeting, held on 3 May, the RBA said there were three options on the table for a rate rise: raising by 15 basis points, 25bps or 40bps.
There was no option for delaying a raise as inflation had increased substantially to above its 2%-3% target range which made the case for a rise in the cash rate. Inflation was unlikely to return to within the range until late-2024, the minutes said.
“Members agreed that the condition the board had set to increase the cash rate had been met. They also agreed that further increases in interest rates would likely be required to ensure that inflation in Australia returns to the target over time.”
The raise of 15bps was “not the preferred option” as it was likely to require further rate rises afterwards. It would also be inconsistent with the historical trend of raising rates by no less than 25bps.
There was a possibility of a raise of 40bps “given the upside risks to inflation and the current very low level of interest rates”.
Therefore, the committee felt the preferred option was 25bps to bring rates to 0.35%.
“A move of this size would help signal that the board was now returning to normal operating procedures after the extraordinary period of the pandemic. Given that the board meets monthly, it would have the opportunity to review the setting of interest rates again within a relatively short period of time, based on additional information,” it said.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
