When two Wrights create a wrong

ASIC/AAT/

26 June 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has had a win against the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) with the Federal Court setting aside a tribunal decision not to uphold an ASIC ban against a former National Australia Bank financial planner who passed himself off as a client to obtain information from a superannuation fund.

The former planner found himself in hot water with ASIC even though he admitted his actions to his employer and tried to make good the losses suffered by an unwitting member of Maritime Super.

The Federal Court agreed with counsel for ASIC that the AAT, in not upholding the banning of the planner, Gerard McCormack, had misunderstood one of the concepts relevant to the imposition of a banning order – namely the concept of maintaining the public interest or confidence in the financial services industry.

The court agreed that the AAT should not have lifted the banning order just because it believed no person had suffered any financial detriment as a result of the actions of the financial planner.

It also agreed that the AAT had misunderstood or failed to have regard to the concept of general deterrence and found that it had misunderstood the meaning of dishonesty by finding that fraud is distinguishable from dishonesty.

The problems for McCormack arose when he began acting for a client named “Wright” who had moved from another NAB financial planner who happened to have another client of similar age, also named “Wright”.

The court was told that McCormack had then passed himself off as being the second Mr Wright to obtain details of moneys transferred from an MLC MasterKey account to Maritime Super and that he later, believing the money had been siphoned from his client by the previous planner, withdrew money from the Maritime Super account.

The court was told that McCormack confronted the previous planner on the issue and was told that two clients existed named “John Wright”, but rather than telling Maritime Super or NAB of his mistake he had again impersonated Wright in seeking to correct the mistakes.

McCormack and his client had then visited the second Wright to assure him the problems would be put right but discovered that as a result of his actions the accounts had been frozen.

McCormack later resigned from his employment with NAB.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 1 week ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

1 week ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

2 weeks 2 days ago

A former financial adviser who stole $4.4 million from his family and friends to feed gambling debts has been permanently banned by ASIC....

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo