What is really ethical?
Consumer advocacy group Choice has released new research that suggests some responsible investment funds aren’t quite as responsible as they make out.
Choice said it had investigated the managers of so-called responsible or sustainable funds and suggested that investors needed to read the fine print when choosing to invest their nest egg in a sustainable or ethical fund.
Choice provided as an example the fact that some superannuation funds allowed investment in uranium mining companies such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto into their green options on the basis that such mines produce material for energy and not nuclear bombs and because they get less than five per cent of their revenue from uranium.
Choice spokesman Christopher Zinn said that because there was no commonly agreed definition of “sustainable”, “responsible” or even “ethical” many of the top shareholdings of funds ended up being very similar to the shares held by ordinary investment funds.
“Consumers interested in the responsible investment sector should check a fund’s product disclosure statement for an explanation of its investment strategy and make sure that it fits in with their own views,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has cancelled the AFSL of a Perth advice firm with the firm having previously seen its licence temporarily suspended in 2020.
Having proposed changes earlier this year, ASIC has clarified how it will support licensees with additional relief under the reportable situations regime.
AMP has partnered with BlackRock and research house Lonsec to provide a model portfolio capability on its North platform that offers “portfolio customisation at scale” to advice practices of all sizes.
Money Management rounds up actions ASIC took against advice individuals in the first half for FY25 from exam falsifications to dishonest conduct.
