Westpoint head accuses auditor

financial planners money management federal court director chief executive

13 April 2006
| By Ross Kelly |

A senior Westpoint director has accused auditor KPMG of already knowing about the failed developer’s problems before ticking-off its reports.

Richard Beck, a key capital raiser for Westpoint, said he warned KPMG his company was pooling funds from separate developments into a “common pot”.

Beck’s accusations surfaced publicly in a transcript of an Australian and Securities and Investments Commission interview with him, published in The Australian newspaper this morning.

Beck also told KPMG that he thought Westpoint’s Ann Street Mezzanine fund, one of the first to collapse, was raising more money from investors than it had disclosed.

“The response I received [from KPMG] was that everything was properly accounted for in accordance with Australian accounting standards, and [they issued] unqualified reports,” said Beck.

The fresh accusations against KPMG follow Money Management reporting in February that financial planners were seeking legal advice over the role of the auditors of Westpoint in an attempt to recover client funds.

“From our initial investigations, it appears there have been irregularities in the audit reports produced by KPMG, which have obviously influenced the outcome of financial planners’ decisions, as well as the structure of some of the internal arrangements,” Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners chief executive Peter Johnston said at the time.

When questioned by Money Management, KPMG refuted claims there were irregularities in its audit reports.

A spokesperson said: “In situations where companies face financial concerns, it is common for those impacted to ask questions of various parties.

“KPMG is confident of the quality and veracity of our audit work in relation to various entities in the Westpoint group.”

ASIC, meanwhile, has asked the Federal Court in Perth to appoint receivers to investigate the assets of four directors of Westpoint, including Norman Phillip Carey.

“If a receiver is not appointed then the defendants can still deal with assets and take steps to put them beyond the creditors,” ASIC warned the court.

A spokesperson for lawyers Slater and Gordon, which is preparing a series of court actions against financial planners who sold Westpoint products on behalf of investors, said this morning that any action was still some time away.

“It will take some time to analyse questionnaires we have sent out and received from investors,” the spokesperson said.

Slater and Gordon is looking to recover over $200 million from up to 100 planners on behalf of close to 2,000 clients sold Westpoint products.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 4 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 6 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS