Westpac/BT: we’ve made some errors

bt funds management financial planning groups westpac BT independent financial advisers

17 October 2002
| By Anonymous (not verified) |

With thebenefit of 20/20 hindsight, Westpac’s buyout of BT Funds Management would have been handled differently, according to Westpac’s group executive of wealth management David Clarke.

After a week during which BT Funds Management dropped fees on its flagship BT Australian Share Fund in an attempt to quell outflows from the group and announced the appointment of US-based Putnam Investments to manage its $5 billion international share portfolio, the team responsible for settling down the acquisition was looking to reassure financial planning groups.

Clarke and BT executive vice-present Rob Coombe toldMoney Managementthat the transition of BT into the Westpac fold was well under control and that the project team was within two weeks of delivering the final shape.

They also suggest the appointment of Putnam had provided “a lot of clarity” for analysts and investors on the direction in which the group was headed.

The bottom line message delivered by Clarke and Coombe was that most of the critical assessments which had resulted in BT’s Australian equities funds losing between $5 million and $8 million a day since the Westpac buy-out, had failed to fully appreciate the level of commitment and planning involved.

Clarke says such assessments had failed to recognise the depth of management talent which existed.

The assessments had also failed to recognise that while Westpac was fully committed to ensuring the success of the buyout, BT Funds Management and Sagitta Rothschild would remain discrete enterprises and be managed as such.

Clarke acknowledges that the majority of the problems and negativity which had been encountered since the buyout had been the result of uncertainty, particularly with respect to who would be managing the international share portfolio, the style of portfolios which would come out of the merged entity and the ongoing relationship with independent financial advisers.

When asked what he would change if Westpac were to undertake the exercise all over again, Clarke says that he would seek to communicate more clearly with financial planning groups.

“We had a week to 10 days immediately after the announcement when we could have been more clear with advisory groups and communicated more effectively,” Clarke says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

5 days 22 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 13 hours ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

4 weeks 1 day ago