Westpac to pay $10.5m penalty for personal advice case
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec428/ec428a97003c404d273b653ab0d7941e46cfc89a" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec428/ec428a97003c404d273b653ab0d7941e46cfc89a" alt="image"
The Federal Court has handed down a $10.5 million penalty to Westpac in relation to proceedings brought by the corporate regulator on the provision of financial product advice.
The penalty related to proceedings brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in 2016 for personal advice that was found to have been provided in relation to calls to 14 customers concerning the rollover of their external superannuation accounts.
ASIC found this was in breach of certain provisions of the Corporations Act by Westpac Securities Administration and BT Funds Management.
Westpac said the penalty was fully provisioned in its first half 2021 accounts.
“We take our obligations to our customers very seriously," a spokesperson for Westpac said.
"This was a test case brought by ASIC against Westpac Securities Administration Limited and BT Funds Management Limited in relation to 14 customers concerning the rollover of their superannuation accounts.
"It was an important process for the financial services industry to provide clarity on the distinction between the provision of ‘personal’ and ‘general’ advice when speaking with our customers. The findings in this case have provided that clarity.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.