Weaven calls for independent research on fees/commissions

industry funds superannuation fund members commissions financial planning financial planning industry superannuation funds FPA retail funds chief executive chairman

27 November 2006
| By John Wilkinson |
image
image
expand image

Garry Weaven

Industry Funds Services executive chair Garry Weaven has called for independent research on a selection of superannuation fund members to show what fees they are paying and how their fund is performing.

He was responding to criticism by Financial Planning Association (FPA) member and Count chairman Barry Lambert at the FPA conference that adviser fees for superannuation meant members were being put into expensive fee-driven retail products.

“We would support research on actual members in industry and retail funds, and let’s see what is left in their accounts after the fees have been taken out,” he said.

It is not known if the FPA will take up the challenge as chief executive, Jo-Anne Bloch, made no mention of joining a survey in her closing remarks at the conference.

Weaven argued commissions paid by superannuation funds on planners’ approved lists were too high, and because industry funds didn’t pay commission planners did not use them.

“The problem for the financial planning industry is it’s carrying the baggage of selling products,” he told a hostile audience.

“So instead of a professional providing a service for a fee, the industry has been overshadowed by its selling baggage.”

Weaven accepted that some advisers do provide good advice, but argued the industry is driven by product selection, which is influenced by commissions.

Lambert said Count tried to put industry funds on its approved list, but because of a lack of research it was unable to do so.

He said Count had looked at the MTAA industry fund, but could not find research on some of the investments the fund made.

“This fund has $63 million in infrastructure, but there is no research available on these investments,” he said. “We are trying our best to give advice on these funds, but if we haven’t got the basis for that advice, then we cannot approve the use of industry funds.”

Weaven argued that there was research available on unlisted managers and that Access Economics had researched all infrastructure investments made by industry funds.

“You can get all the research on industry funds you need,” he argued.

“What is important is the fee structure and the asset allocation, and you can easily find out about that from the fund, it is not rocket science.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS