Watchdogs to test industry
TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Consumers’ Association (ACA) will engage in a survey of the financial planning industry designed to test the quality of advice.
The survey will involve selected consumers approaching 150 financial planners to obtain advice and financial plans, which will then be examined by a panel of experienced planners and compliance experts.
In an effort to gather the widest possible results, the survey will cover advice available across the industry, including banks, life insurance companies, financial planning firms, stockbrokers and accountants.
The survey repeats similar exercises undertaken in 1995 and 1998.
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has also agreed to take part in the survey and will be involved in the design of the survey itself and provide assistance throughout the assessment period.
Consumer volunteers are being recruited through the April edition ofChoice, the official magazine of the ACA. The results of the survey will be published in February 2003.
ASIC chair David Knott says the driver for the survey was the need to ensure quality advice was on offer to satisfy a growing market demand.
“With the growing importance of financial planning for Australian consumers, it is vital that we track the quality of advice provided in the marketplace”, Knott says.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered.
Rather than taking a controlling approach, the latest generation of overseas private equity deals is helping advice firms to achieve their growth ambitions, three commentators have said.
Private wealth firm Fitzpatricks Group has appointed a newly created head of product, who previously spent 20 years at CFS, to bolster its range of investment options.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written direction after advice regarding non-concessional contributions meant an individual was forced to withdraw over $330,000 from their super.
