Use robo-advice as diagnostic tool
Successful robo advisers should take a diagnostic approach to investment advice rather than a ‘design and implement' approach, where they can seek to improve clients' investment choices rather than starting from scratch, Melbourne Business School principal fellow, Sam Wylie said.
Robo-advisers currently took the same approach as architects: they looked at clients' situation and their goals, age, income, current investments and risk aversion, recommended choices on how much to save and how much to invest in each asset class, and they then implemented the choices.
"I think this is the wrong approach for do-it-yourself investors who are the natural clientele of robo-advisers," Wylie said.
"Those investors have already made investment choices and implemented them. Robo-advisers should be working with the client to examine those choices and find improvements."
Good robo-advisers should ask investors why they have made current choices and propose improvements.
"Why do you have an SMSF? How is that helping you? Here is a list of ways in which self-managed super adds value for investors. Which of these apply to you? None of them? Ok, why don't you switch to a low cost industry fund?" Wylie said.
Diagnostic robo-advisers also faced the challenge of finding out how to charge ongoing rather than one-off, or episodic fees. While they charge a percentage of funds under advice (usually between 0.25 to 0.75 per cent), it is very difficult to charge ongoing fees without providing ongoing advice.
Wylie said they could either combine robo-advice with wider services like an SMSF administration provider, or the diagnostic service could be provided by a private wealth management firm or industry fund to establish contact with wealthy investors.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
E&P Financial Group, former parent of Dixon Advisory, has formally requested to delist from the ASX, with the company noting the negative impact of regulatory proceedings on its share price.
Commentators have discussed how value for money is becoming more critical than ever as licensee fees rise and failure by an AFSL to provide this is driving them to self-licensing.
The final terms of reference for the Dixon Advisory inquiry have been released by the Senate economics references committee, and advisers have just over five weeks to make their submissions.
Financial advisers are in the running to win one of the coveted Women in Finance Awards 2024.
