Use of general research for advice 'under challenge'
The days of relying on general research from research houses for the provision of advice is "under challenge right now" from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), according to research consultant Rob Mcgregor.
"ASIC is no longer going to accept outdated research, and a basic subscription to a research house is no longer going to be enough to satisfy the regulator, McGregor said at the Association of Financial Advisers conference.
This is because the regulator is "now really focused on the quality of research and due diligence that goes into recommending a product to a client", he said.
Stating there is a "real disconnect between advisers and research in regards to investment advice", McGregor added that "the days of getting a research report and sitting on it are gone".
He added that if the word 'monitoring' is used in a Statement of Advice, thereby giving clients the impression you are monitoring a recommended product, advisers will need to put every effort into actually monitoring that product.
In addition, McGrgeor said "methodologies around portfolio construction" used by advisers are areas that ASIC is "looking hard at now".
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
