US mutual funds hit a snag
US mutual funds still have their work cut out for them before they roll out their fund offering into the Australian market.
Complications have arisen due to the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions in the Ralph Review. US funds only return dividends while Australian funds provide returns to investors as distributions.
Under changes proposed in the Ralph Review, the US returns will still feel the full weight of CGT, while local funds while only bear half that rate.
Merrill Lynch Asset Management has already launched a suite of US mutual funds while Alliance Capital is applying the finishing touches to its offering.
Merrill Lynch Mercury Asset Management retail business manager David Skelton says the relaxation of the Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) laws provide a positive environment for mutual funds. However, changes to CGT were not mentioned when the FIF laws were relaxed.
"We started our research some time ago, in April of this year while these proposals are only new with the Ralph Review," Skelton says.
"Obviously if we had known this would occur and been told of the effect we would have taken a different approach back then."
Skelton says the Ralph Review is still in proposal form and lobbying is in place to show the government the consequences of the proposals.
"I think we will receive a warm response because it defeats the whole purpose of the FIF laws."
The FIF legislation was passed in June this year to allow tax US domiciled funds to enter Australia and compete on an equal footing with local funds.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
