US managers grapple with regulation
Asset managers in the US are facing the same challenges as their counterparts in Australia in terms of coping with existing and proposed regulation, according to new research released by Boston-based Cerulli Associates.
According to the US-based research group, US asset managers are being burdened by rising compliance costs that are impacting their profitability as they spend more time, resources and money in meeting their compliance obligations.
The research deals with the manner in which US regulatory bodies, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission, have been stepping up their efforts to ensure that all investors are treated equally by their financial services providers.
“In the wake of recent corporate fraud, a heightened threat of terrorism, and the market-timing scandals within the mutual fund industry, the list of relevant financial services-related regulatory organisations is growing,” Cerulli said.
In addition, it claimed that over the past several years a number of key pieces of legislation have been implemented that are dramatically affecting asset management firms — Sarbanes-Oxley, the US Patriotic Act and anti-money laundering legislation.
Cerrulli said these laws, combined with the Compliance Programs of Investment Companies and Investment Advisor Act have placed substantial pressure on asset managers.
The research suggests that asset managers have moved to deal with the challenges through stronger compliance departments and by beefing up their staffing in key areas.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
