Unlisted investments face closer oversight
Tony D'Aloisio
The last day of October has emerged as a key date for companies marketing unlisted mortgage and property schemes as a result of a review conducted by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
This is because ASIC has nominated October 31 as the date by which existing unlisted property and mortgage schemes report against eight benchmarks outlined in a regulatory guide or, in the case of unlisted property schemes, they provide updated disclosure to existing investors.
The new arrangements were outlined today by ASIC chairman Tony D’Aloisio, who released a range of proposals aimed at improving disclosure by unlisted mortgage and property schemes.
However, it is those running unlisted mortgage schemes who will face the greater initial challenge, with the regulator not only setting the October 31 reporting date but insisting that new and existing schemes report against the benchmarks on ‘an if not, why not?’ basis thereafter.
Where unlisted property schemes are concerned, ASIC said it did not propose to extend the ‘if not, why not?’ approach, but would be reviewing the sector to see whether regulatory guidance had improved investor disclosure as well as seeking to determine the degree to which it had been impacted by changed market conditions.
“Based on these factors, ASIC may consider whether there is a need to establish benchmarks for property schemes to disclose on an ‘if not, why not?’ basis,” it said.
D’Aloisio said ASIC’s work with unlisted and unrated debentures had highlighted the need to put greater resources into the area.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
