Unique identifier proposed for planners
Financial planners may be required to have carry a unique identifier as part of enhancements being considered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for the financial advice register.
Senior ASIC executives have acknowledged to a Parliamentary Committee that the use of a unique identifier for financial planners is something which can be considered for the register in a move which would see consumers conducting simple name searches.
The use of the unique identifier was proposed to ASIC by West Australian Labor Senator, Matt Keogh who expressed concern that financial planners could have multiple registrations on the register which made it difficult for consumers to specifically identify them.
"There are many examples in the register where you would have the same person with different information recorded — the same name and the same date of birth but different information recorded. So if the consumer says, ‘Oh well, this person is registered here, and I will look at that record,' and the other information does not come up," he said.
ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell acknowledged the senator's concern and pointed out that the register was relatively new and that the regulator was looking at potential improvements.
He said those improvements might include the use of an identifier and, possibly, the inclusion of whether the planner had a Financial Ombudsman Service finding against them.
Kell noted the popularity of the register, noting that as at around November it had been the subject of 1.2 million searches.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
