Two life/risk advisers enter into ASIC EU

life/risk ASIC bans

21 December 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Two life/risk advisers have entered into enforceable undertakings (EUs) with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which will them being overseen by independent experts for the next three years.

The regulator detailed the EUs today, stating they had been entered into because of the deficiencies in advice provided about insurance products.

ASIC named the advisers as Victorian-based Christopher John Cannon and Brisbane-based Danny Charles Pianta.

ASIC said Cannon had entered into the EU after the regulator had outlined concerns that he had:

•             failed to act in the best interest of clients in relation to personal advice;

•             advised clients to switch insurance products when it was not appropriate;

•             in some instances, failed to consider all costs, risks, benefits and disadvantages when advising clients to switch from an existing insurance product into a recommended new insurance policy; and

•             used generic Statement of Advice templates when making Financial Product Advice recommendations to clients.

It said Cannon was a director of PAC Financial Pty Ltd and an authorised representative of Austplan Pty Ltd and that it had been concerned that Mr Cannon's advice about insurance products from June 2015 to August 2016 did not meet the standards required of a financial adviser and that he had failed to comply with financial services laws.

It said Cannon acknowledged that ASIC's concerns about his advice were reasonably held and it, in turn, acknowledged Cannon’s cooperation through the investigation.

Dealing with Pianta, ASIC said it was concerned that his advice about insurance products from June 2015 to August 2016 did not meet the standards required of a financial adviser and that he had failed to comply with financial services laws.

In particular, ASIC was concerned that Mr Pinata:

•             failed to act in the best interest of clients in relation to personal advice;

•             advised clients to switch insurance products when it was not appropriate;

•             in some instances, failed to consider all costs, risks, benefits and disadvantages when advising clients to switch from an existing insurance product into a recommended new insurance policy; and.

ASIC said Pianta acknowledged that ASIC's concerns about his advice were reasonably held.

ASIC acknowledged Pianta's cooperation with ASIC through its investigation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 days 22 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS