Two expert super panel members removed
Two of the people appointed to the Fair Work Commission's (FWC's) expert superannuation panel have been removed from the process due to perceived conflicts of interest.
The people, who were appointed under a process put in place by former Workplace Relations and Financial Services minister, Bill Shorten, have been removed as a result of a decision by the president of the FWC, Iain Ross.
The pair, MTAA Super trustee board member, Vicki Allen and Australian Ethical Superannuation Fund trustee board member, Steve Gibbs, were held by Ross to be open to perceptions of conflict of interest because both funds had MySuper products.
Further, Ross said in his decision that the position of Allen and Gibbs on the expert super panel made it likely they would see "confidential or commercially sensitive information about funds or entities that are actual or potential competitors".
The potential conflicts of interest of members of the specialist superannuation panel were first raised by the Financial Services Council (FSC) in submissions to the FWC, and the Senate was later told by the Minister for Employment, Senator Eric Abetz that the panel members were earning $922 a day.
Abetz also made clear in an answer to a question on notice that he had not supported the appointment of the four panelists.
The removal of Allen and Gibbs from the panel process leaves two remaining panelists, Arthur Apted and Tim Harcourt.
Allen announced in correspondence to the president of the FWC that she had late last month resigned from the board of Pillar Administration which handles the superannuation administration of First State Super, Aon Master Trust, Virgin Super and the Public Sector Superannuation Accumulation Plan.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
