Trustees must co-operate on governance guidelines
Not-for-profit superannuation fund trustees have been warned that if they do not agree on fund governance guidelines they risk having them imposed by the Government.
The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) will release the draft guidelines today, but the organisation’s chairman, Gerard Noonan, admitted there had been disagreement and divisions.
The AIST’s call for support for a voluntary principles-based approach stands in contrast to industry fund calls for financial planners to be subject to a tighter regulatory approach directly overseen by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Opening the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds on the Gold Coast, Noonan argued a voluntary, principles-based code had to be preferable to one imposed by the Government.
“We have to agree on a voluntary code because, if we don’t, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) will step in to impose a Governance code,” he said.
Noonan said he felt sure a voluntary, principles-based approach was in the best interests of the industry and would garner the respect of the current Government and future Governments.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
