The true cost of advice

financial planning fee-for-service commissions financial planning practices financial planners

7 July 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The true cost of a client review is around $2,500, according to financial planning consulting firm Business Health.

The consulting firm arrived at that figure based on a calculation incorporating average staff and overhead costs, profit margins and the time taken or actions required to deliver the service. Business Health said the $2,500 figure was “regularly validated” by its clients.

But it’s a figure many financial planners are yet to fully grasp.

Business Health said that both in Australia and in other offshore markets, many, if not the majority, of financial planning practices had “no clear idea” of what it cost them to deliver the services they offered.

The company said payments by commissions and business valuations based on revenue multiples had in fact been “an enemy — masking the need for them to come to grips with the real value of their operation”.

Regulatory changes prompted by community pressures mean that is now changing.

“Value propositions are being reviewed, client feedback is sought, service packages are being reconstructed and [practices’] capabilities are being reassessed,” the group said.

But underpinning any transition to fee-for-service must be a “realistic view” about the cost to deliver advice.

The group said the cost of a client review is perhaps the “single largest cost” borne by planning practices in delivering their service, and should therefore “only be offered to clients who have the desire and capability to pay for each review they receive”.

As such, advisers must determine which clients are willing to pay for which services, and whether those services can be delivered in a manner acceptable to the client, and financially viable for the practice.

With clients soon to have more control over price negotiations, advisers must also be able to communicate the value they are adding, with Business Health arguing that “price is only an issue in the absence of value as perceived by the client”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 4 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 6 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS