Tribunal calls for super fund transparency
SUPER fund trustees are being urged by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) to clearly identify reasons leading to granting or disallowing benefits to members.
SCT chairman Graham McDonald says while providing such information is not a legally enforceable requirement, lack of explanation often results in complaints being lodged with the tribunal.
McDonald says such action would also benefit funds operating in a competitive market to differentiate themselves and that spelling out the justification for their decisions may help to attract new members.
“The lack of an explanation coupled with advice that a free review mechanism exists, almost inevitably results in an application being lodged with the tribunal, [and] given those circumstances, which of us would not seek to pursue an appeal?” McDonald says.
“On the other hand, a member who receives a summary of reasons and/or a list of the factors considered by the trustee is much better placed ... to assess whether lodging an application for review would be worthwhile,” he says.
He says a growing appreciation by the courts that super is no longer a discretionary matter, but a compulsory entitlement may ultimately lead to requiring trustees to give reasons to members for their decisions.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
With an advice M&A deal taking around six months to enact, two experts have shared their tips on how buyers and sellers can avoid “deal fatigue” and prevent potential deals from collapsing.
Several financial advisers have been shortlisted in the ninth annual Women in Finance Awards 2025, to be held on 14 November.
Digital advice tools are on the rise, but licensees will need to ensure they still meet adviser obligations or potentially risk a class action if clients lose money from a rogue algorithm.
Shaw and Partners has merged with Sydney wealth manager Kennedy Partners Wealth, while Ord Minnett has hired a private wealth adviser from Morgan Stanley.
