Traditional investment categories out of whack
|
|
Investors and financial planners are placing too much importance on traditional investment styles such as ‘core’ and ‘value’ when choosing fund managers to invest in, according to the chief investment officer of Wingate Asset Management, Chad Padowitz.
Padowitz said investors should look at the individual characteristics of the way a fund manager invested his assets, and whether his fund differed from the market index, rather than focusing on ‘core’, ‘value’ or ‘growth’ fund managers.
“I know that if you have a low tracking error objective, which many funds do... then you’re going to [perform] very close to the benchmark, whether you call yourself a core or value [fund manager],” Padowitz said.
“A low tracking error is when no one wants to move too far away from the index. And of course, if no one wants to move too far away from the index, then you’re going to be very similar to the other fund managers,” he said.
Padowitz said peer pressure and the fear of risking their careers pushed many fund managers to have low tracking error objectives, even if they claimed otherwise.
“At the end of the day, all you’re doing is buying small stakes in companies. And very few companies would say ‘we’re a growth company’, ‘we’re a value company’ or ‘we’re a core company’. They would just say: ‘This is what we do and this is what we sell’,” he said.
“It doesn’t make sense that the company is not growth, value or core in their [own] mind, but they can become that in [an investor’s mind].”
“Most great investors place no value on concepts like that,” Padowitz said.
Wingate positioned themselves as a value-based manager, but that was only for identifying themselves among investors, he added.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
