Tower opts for more equitable recap bid

credit suisse chief executive

2 July 2003
| By Craig Phillips |

Tower Limitedhas opted for what it deems a “fairer” and more “certain” recapitalisation proposal after abandoning the option proposed by Guinness Peat Group (GPG) in favour of an alternative recommendation put to it by First New Zealand Capital and Credit Suisse First Boston last week.

GPG has - until Friday - the option of underwriting the new proposal, which aims to raise NZ$210.8 million ($185 million) through a fully underwritten pro-rata four for three rights issue at a price of NZ$0.90 per share.

The GPG proposal, criticised by other Tower shareholders including Hanover Group, aimed to raise $202.9 million for Tower but would have resulted in GPG taking a 30-35 per cent stake in the company.

According to Tower’s board of directors the alternative proposal is fairer as it allows all shareholders to participate on an equal basis and offers more certainty than the initial proposal.

Tower’s chief executive for Australia Jim Minto is happy the issue is close to resolution.

“It’s very pleasing from a market perspective to see this issue of capital put behind us. While we were pleased with the initial GPG offer because that gave us some market certainty, the board has opted for the latter proposal,” he says.

“The most important thing is that private clients don’t understand that their investments are separate from the Tower share - they see both as being inter-related so it will be good to have the issue resolved.”

Tower received advice on the issue from consultancy group Grant Samuel.

“The overriding benefit of the alternative recapitalisation proposal is that it allows all shareholders to participate in the recapitalisation on an equal basis. Directors will need to consider whether the impact of extra fees of approximately two cents per share outweigh this benefit. Subject to the confirmation of the final underwriting arrangements and the removal of the remaining conditionality, Grant Samuel believes that the alternative recapitalisation is a preferred alternative,” the consultancy group says.

First NZ Capital Securities and Credit Suisse First Boston Australia Limited have both offered to underwrite the proposal with a number of institutions sub-underwriting the issue.

The underwriting fee will be 2.75 per cent plus a management fee of 0.5 per cent.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 hour ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

1 week 6 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 5 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago