Tougher monitoring for training providers
Financial planning training organisations will have to get on a register and receive approval from the independent industry-established educational standard setting body for financial advisers if they wish to amend, change or vary educational courses in any way, the Financial Planning Association said.
Chief executive, Dante de Gori, said the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) or anyone else did not hitherto have the power to prevent training organisations from altering the curriculum.
He added that the independent body would set the curriculum, decide on the future framework of RG146, and establish courses that would meet the criteria of that curriculum. It would also look at who the course providers would be, as well as who the auditors for those providers would be.
"Those of you and future planners who are looking to do degrees or courses that map back to the requirements can look at the register and be comfortable and confident to know that those courses will recognised and there won't be questions asked," de Gori said.
"Secondly, if you're an employer, you will then be able to verify courses that potential employees are putting forward to you knowing that they are approved by the independent body."
de Gori said he had talked to a member who had applied for an Australian financial services licence (AFSL) by submitting their qualifications: they had a Masters in Financial Planning, a Certified Financial Planner qualification, a degree in economics and had been practising as an authorised representative for 12 years.
"[But] ASIC asked them if they were RG146 compliant. The reason is ASIC do not, from an education perspective, hold a register of training courses that tells them that those courses map that to RG146," he said.
"You think it's ludicrous right? This person has done so much training and qualifications, yet ASIC just want to know are you RG146 compliant?"
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
