Time to end grandfathering, says FPA
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has told the Royal Commission it is timely to review the appropriateness of grandfathered commissions and has recommended that grandfathered commissions be phased out over three years.
However, the FPA has argued that the carve-out in relation should be maintained in the short to medium term (at least three years) because the Life Insurance Framework is in its infancy and is scheduled to be reviewed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in any case.
The planning group has also pointed to the fact that the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) had not succeeded in dealing with vertical integration.
In a submission responding to the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry’s first round hearings into financial advice, the FPA has acknowledged that five years after the Future of Financial Advice it might be time for a change.
It said grandfathered commissions had “led to an environment where many clients are paying fees and yet receiving no services”.
“Ceasing grandfathered commissions and making all ongoing fee arrangements subject to opt-in will result in grandfathered fee arrangements quickly coming to an end where no services are being provided to consumers,” the FPA said.
However, in doing so, it noted that commissions were “by their nature part of a product cost” and that in most cases “the removal of an adviser does not provide any benefit to a consumer as the provider simply retains the amount that would otherwise have been paid to the adviser”.
It said that commissions had been built into the fee structure of many older products and that it was important to note that it was the product manufacturer who paid the commission for their fees and that it was “not a specifically client authorised payments”.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
New Zealand’s financial regulator is following the footsteps of its Tasman neighbours and proposing to conduct a review on improving the accessibility of financial advice and advice business models.
