Three-quarters of AFCA advice complaints relating to Dixon Advisory

16 March 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

Over 1,700 investment and advice complaints received by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) last year related to the collapse of Dixon Advisory, representing three-quarters of total sector complaints.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) commenced civil penalty proceedings against Dixon Advisory and Superannuation Services (DASS) in September 2020 for alleged conflicts, best interest failures and inappropriate advice and its Australian financial services licence was suspended in April 2022.

Consumers were urged to contact AFCA to see if they were eligible for compensation under the potential Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).

Speaking at the AIA Adviser Summit, Shail Singh, acting lead ombudsman for investment and advice, said overall numbers of advice complaints were down once Dixon Advisory ones were excluded.

“The trend in advice is a continued improvement and numbers have been down on previous years. We received 2,211 complaints, a number of which related to Dixon Advisory. If you deduct the Dixon Advisory complaints then we had 483 complaints received which is down 47% from the previous year. So the trend in advice complaints is down and that’s a good one," he said.

“Looking at those 483 disputes, a number of them related to systemic issues such as a financial firm engaging in a business model that has risk involved such as taking low balance SMSFs and moving them into property. There were a number of other ‘batch’ complaints which were more issues with a business model."

Singh was unsure of the reason behind the significant downturn but felt it was a positive step for the industry in its development and improvement.

“It is hard to say exactly what has led to the reduction, some might say it is because there are less advisers, but if you look at the nature of the disputes, the character has changed and the type of issues are much more tricky and less straightforward. 

“I feel really positive [the industry] is heading the way of a profession looking at the disputes and the nature of them.”

AUTHOR

Submitted by ChrisC123 on Thu, 2023-03-16 15:36

They were a product provider. Virtually all complaints and restitution is from the actions of product providers.
Why do advisers have to fund COSL? And pay PI insurance?

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 3 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

4 days 22 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 2 hours ago