Three-quarters of AFCA advice complaints relating to Dixon Advisory

16 March 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Over 1,700 investment and advice complaints received by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) last year related to the collapse of Dixon Advisory, representing three-quarters of total sector complaints.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) commenced civil penalty proceedings against Dixon Advisory and Superannuation Services (DASS) in September 2020 for alleged conflicts, best interest failures and inappropriate advice and its Australian financial services licence was suspended in April 2022.

Consumers were urged to contact AFCA to see if they were eligible for compensation under the potential Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).

Speaking at the AIA Adviser Summit, Shail Singh, acting lead ombudsman for investment and advice, said overall numbers of advice complaints were down once Dixon Advisory ones were excluded.

“The trend in advice is a continued improvement and numbers have been down on previous years. We received 2,211 complaints, a number of which related to Dixon Advisory. If you deduct the Dixon Advisory complaints then we had 483 complaints received which is down 47% from the previous year. So the trend in advice complaints is down and that’s a good one," he said.

“Looking at those 483 disputes, a number of them related to systemic issues such as a financial firm engaging in a business model that has risk involved such as taking low balance SMSFs and moving them into property. There were a number of other ‘batch’ complaints which were more issues with a business model."

Singh was unsure of the reason behind the significant downturn but felt it was a positive step for the industry in its development and improvement.

“It is hard to say exactly what has led to the reduction, some might say it is because there are less advisers, but if you look at the nature of the disputes, the character has changed and the type of issues are much more tricky and less straightforward. 

“I feel really positive [the industry] is heading the way of a profession looking at the disputes and the nature of them.”

AUTHOR

Submitted by ChrisC123 on Thu, 2023-03-16 15:36

They were a product provider. Virtually all complaints and restitution is from the actions of product providers.
Why do advisers have to fund COSL? And pay PI insurance?

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

2 months 1 week ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

2 months 1 week ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

2 months 1 week ago

A Sydney-based financial adviser has been banned from providing financial services in the interest of consumer protection after failing to act on conduct concerns. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of a $250 million Sydney fund manager, one of two AFSL cancellations announced by the corporate regulator....

3 weeks 1 day ago

Having divested its advice business in August, AMP is undergoing restructuring in at least four other departments amid a cost simplification program....

2 weeks 5 days ago