Termination payments legislation passed through the Senate
The passing of a Corporations Amendment Bill through the Senate will empower shareholders to reject excessive termination payments and prevent irresponsible remuneration practices.
The Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen, welcomed the passage of the Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Termination Payments) Bill 2009 through the Senate.
“These reforms will empower shareholders to reject excessive termination payments and promote responsible remuneration practices,” he said, adding that the change in the law will prevent termination payments reaching up to seven times a director’s total annual remuneration package.
Key features of the reform will mean that shareholder approval must be sought before termination benefits for company directors and executives can exceed one year’s average base salary, a broadening of the definition of what constitutes a ‘benefit’, a specifying of what type of payments are or are not termination benefits, the defining of ‘base salary’, and the immediate repayment of unauthorised termination payments with increased penalties.
The scope of the requirements relating to termination benefits has also been expanded to include senior executives or key management personnel.
AUTHOR
Caroline Munro
Recommended for you
ASIC has shared the percentage of breach reports related to financial advice in FY24, noting increased reporting by smaller AFSLs.
With less than 5 per cent of Dixon Advisory complaints closed, AFCA has detailed how it is dealing with systemic issues, known as batch matters, through a consistent yet case-by-case approach.
For financial advisers and business owners seeking to run a top advice firm, Adviser Ratings has shared the characteristics of these leaders from top firms focusing on “scale, specialisation and sophistication”.
As Stephen Jones cites the new class of qualified advisers as a way to reduce legislative complexity in advice, the FAAA’s Sarah Abood says its members still have qualms with the idea and its naming.
