Tech to help reduce price of advice
The Government is looking to robo-advice and fintech to reduce the cost of advice and increase the quality of advice, according to Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology Jane Hume.
Speaking at the Association of Financial Advisers Vision conference, Hume said the government was working with the regulators on looking at the algorithms in technology advisers already used, such as robo-advice, and having that be compliant from the first iteration of advice it came out with as opposed to approving the plan at the end of the advice process.
“The value you add on top of that is what would potentially be audited as opposed to the grunt work behind. This will make an enormous difference in the way you approach clients, workload and what you’re concentrating on,” she said.
“It can potentially condense and automate some of the approvals and consents you have to go through with clients and we know how onerous they are.”
Hume said this would help advisers price their advice to reflect the hours of work they put in.
“If consumers have to pay many thousands of dollars for a statement of advice (SoA), then many people who need that advice most will not be able to access it,” she said.
“It’s not particularly useful if customers are paying for the manual production of hundreds of pages, much of which is boiler plate and they won’t read.
“So, what I’m focused on is helping advisers get access to the tools they need to deliver high-quality, compliant advice at an affordable price. That can happen, but to do it, it’s going to need a greater role for technology.”
She said through technology advisers could focus on spending more time with their clients, listening to their needs, tailoring solutions, and discussing their recommended actions.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
