Tax-style “high audit” system proposed for advice space
Financial advisers’ high regulatory burden is the product of a system that wrongly fails to distinguish “high risk” and “low risk” advice, an adviser believes.
Just as the tax system delineates higher risk players with a “high audit” status, so too should financial advice regulators, according to MEDIQ Financial managing director and AFA Rising Star Ravi Agarwal.
“The people who are providing advice 'low audit’ advice, things like making sure they have the right superannuation and insurances and they have a plan and are working towards financial goals shouldn’t have the onus placed on them to prove that they are not double gearing into a property fund,” he told Money Management.
Agarwal believes the failure to separate riskier financial activities from those offered by everyday advisers is damaging client/adviser relationships and the profession’s perception among the wider community.
He said anything involving complex exposure that is difficult to articulate to the client, such as derivatives, should be subject to rigorous regulatory guidelines, but retail advice should be subject to less scrutiny.
Recommended for you
The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort says it has received over 200 claims for compensation relating to personal financial advice since its inception and detailed the specific recurring issues being raised by claimants.
Two financial advisers have shared with Money Management why they opted to specialise in certain client niches when setting up their own business.
Insignia Financial has reached a major milestone in completing the separation of MLC Wealth from NAB, having acquired the firm back in 2021.
There could be changes ahead for how ASIC requires licensees to handle conflicts of interest as the corporate regulator announces it will be meeting key stakeholders next year to update guidance.
