Tax haven crackdown bad for financial services
The financial services industry in tax havens could suffer immensely if the proposed crackdown is carried out, according to a study from RMIT University.
World leaders and organisations are calling for a so-called 'tax haven crackdown', which could see the end to bank secrecy laws in countries such as the Channel Islands, Cayman Islands and the Isle of Man.
"Tax havens will continue to provide reduced banking and financial services due to the new international law," said Dr John McLaren, who studied the future survival of tax havens and offshore financial centres in the new international legal environment.
"However, they still perform an important role by providing expertise in investment, insurance and protecting assets of the wealthy - particularly in countries where individuals are persecuted for their religious beliefs or homosexuality," McLaren said.
"The Australian Government invests its Future Fund through a tax haven - the Cayman Islands - simply because of the expertise and the tax benefits," he added.
But in McLaren's opinion, this area of international taxation law would keep evolving, especially given the financial problems being experienced in Europe and the US.
"Tax havens will be blamed for some of the world's current economic problems," he said. "For example, in Europe, countries in financial crisis will try to blame tax havens for reducing their government revenue."
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
