Tax agents regime postponed for financial planners
The Treasury has deferred the application of the National Tax Agent Services regime to financial planners until 1 July, 2011, a move which has been applauded by financial planning industry groups but has caused concern for an accounting group.
The new tax agent services regime, which has replaced six state-based Tax Agents Boards with a single, standard national system, came into effect on 1 March this year. Yesterday Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation, Bill Shorten, announced new regulations that clarify how ‘in-house’ advisers and custodians are treated under the regime.
“Certain services, provided within a consolidated group, stapled entities, partnerships, and joint ventures, will now be exempt from the definition of ‘tax agent service’ and ‘BAS service’, which will reduce the regulatory burden on those types of businesses,” said Shorten.
The extension of the application of the regime to financial planners was to allow for further consultation with the industry, he added. The Treasury will release a consultation paper at the end of this month.
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) applauded the extension. FPA chief executive Mark Rantall said the association appreciated Shorten’s prompt attention to the matter, adding that the tax regime was an additional regulatory burden on financial planners — along with the Credit Act and the Financial Services Regime — that the FPA considered to be unnecessary.
“We feel financial planners do not need additional licensing,” said Rantall. “Tax advice during the financial planning process is incidental,” he said, adding that any additional training around tax advice should fall under the Corporations Act.
AFA chief executive Richard Klipin stated that the extension demonstrated that Shorten was a strong advocate for financial services, “willing to listen to the industry’s concerns”.
The National Institute of Accountants (NIA), however, was disappointed by the delay, stating it would leave Australians receiving tax advice from their financial planner unprotected.
The NIA stated that the purpose of the new regime was to regulate all providers of tax advice, and the exclusion of financial planners defeated its intended objective and was putting consumers at risk.
“It’s irrefutable that financial planners provide tax advice and therefore it is inconsistent that they be excluded,” said NIA chief executive Andrew Conway.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
