Systems, not planners to blame for fee for no service
The failure of bank operating protocols were a greater reason for fee for no service than the deliberate actions of financial advisers, according to Westpac chief executive, Brian Hartzer.
Giving evidence before the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Hartzer said that while there may have been some deliberate action on the part of advisers, “we would say that the majority of it is, effectively, a poor operating control around record keeping for the provision of advice”.
“There are some cases, of course, where we've had planners who perhaps have deliberately charged someone knowing they weren't going to provide the service. There have been others where there have been errors in people not following up,” he said. “But the majority of it - from what we can see so far - is to do with gaps in our record keeping.”
“So if I had my time over again, we'd take a very different approach to positively collecting, storing, demonstrating and confirming that customers were happy with the service that they had received, before we charged them,” Hartzer said.
Recommended for you
Two commentators have shared why the inclusion of alternatives in a diversified portfolio shouldn’t be a simple switch with a traditional asset and will depend heavily on clients’ objectives.
Morgans chief executive, John Clifford, has announced he will step down from the wealth management group after eight years leading the business.
Funds under administration on the BT Panorama platform have passed $120 billion in the last six months as it progresses its migration of Asgard into the platform.
Private markets may be the hot topic of the day but two financial advisers have shared the red flags to consider and why advisers shouldn’t be tempted to invest solely in the pursuit of higher returns.
