Synchron calls FSC remuneration model anti-competitive

insurance financial planning FPA government and regulation FSC AFA association of financial advisers life insurance financial services council financial advisers financial planning association australian securities and investments commission money management director

12 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Synchron director Don Trapnell said his company would never support a model for adviser remuneration that was imposed by a cohort of life insurance companies and the Financial Services Council (FSC), but would adopt a model if it were driven by competitive forces.

"What we are seeing now is life insurance companies, via their association with the FSC, working together to form a policy that imposes a uniform remuneration model with uniform responsibility periods on advisers.

"That is anti-competitive and Synchron will never support that kind of behaviour," he said.

Trapnell said changes to responsibility periods had been driven by competitive pressures in the past. 

Competition should continue to dictate any further changes in adviser periods, he said.

The FSC's proposal includes a claw-back arrangement where 100 per cent of upfront commissions are returned to the insurance company in the case of a policy lapsing within the first year, 75 per cent if it lapses within two years and 50 per cent if it lapses in the third.

Trapnell said insurance policies lapsed for a variety of reasons.

"This is not the fault of the advisers and advisers should not be penalised for it," he said.

While a Money Management forum last month found churning was not as widespread as many industry critics suggested, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said its work had identified it as a real problem and supported the FSC's proposal.

Both the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and the Financial Planning Association (FPA) have supported elements of the proposal; however, the most contentious issue for advisers has been around the claw-back provisions.

Suggestions by the AFA, FPA and respondents at Money Management's forum indicated the most likely resolution was a hybrid remuneration model.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

5 days 10 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS