Synchron calls FSC remuneration model anti-competitive

insurance financial planning FPA government and regulation FSC AFA association of financial advisers life insurance financial services council financial advisers financial planning association australian securities and investments commission money management director

12 November 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Synchron director Don Trapnell said his company would never support a model for adviser remuneration that was imposed by a cohort of life insurance companies and the Financial Services Council (FSC), but would adopt a model if it were driven by competitive forces.

"What we are seeing now is life insurance companies, via their association with the FSC, working together to form a policy that imposes a uniform remuneration model with uniform responsibility periods on advisers.

"That is anti-competitive and Synchron will never support that kind of behaviour," he said.

Trapnell said changes to responsibility periods had been driven by competitive pressures in the past. 

Competition should continue to dictate any further changes in adviser periods, he said.

The FSC's proposal includes a claw-back arrangement where 100 per cent of upfront commissions are returned to the insurance company in the case of a policy lapsing within the first year, 75 per cent if it lapses within two years and 50 per cent if it lapses in the third.

Trapnell said insurance policies lapsed for a variety of reasons.

"This is not the fault of the advisers and advisers should not be penalised for it," he said.

While a Money Management forum last month found churning was not as widespread as many industry critics suggested, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said its work had identified it as a real problem and supported the FSC's proposal.

Both the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and the Financial Planning Association (FPA) have supported elements of the proposal; however, the most contentious issue for advisers has been around the claw-back provisions.

Suggestions by the AFA, FPA and respondents at Money Management's forum indicated the most likely resolution was a hybrid remuneration model.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 6 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS