Superannuation member statements need less focus on past performance
Short term reporting and past performance of the future benefits of a superannuation fund encourages unnecessary knee-jerk reactions from members, according to a new white paper from software provider Provisio Technologies.
The report, entitled 'Past vs future in super statement: Focus on retirement, not last year', found that by focusing on the results of the previous 12 months, member statements provide Australians with "little idea" of what their compulsory savings might achieve in the form of retirement income.
A single year's performance has little or no lasting effect on a 30-year-plus investment plan, the report stated.
"We think it's time that all superannuation funds provide members with constructive information, taking into account all of the variables, on the retirement income that can be expected," Provisio director Cameron O'Sullivan said.
Included in the white paper is a case study that maps the effects of short-term market fluctuations on the retirement income for an average 45- or 65-year old.
The study was based on findings from an October report by SuperRatings, which revealed that between 30 June and 30 September 2011, balanced investment funds lost $5,000 for every $100,000 invested in the fund.
According to Provisio, a person aged 45 with a balanced fund of $100,000 would have dropped to $95,000 based on the 5 per cent drop.
The impact on their retirement income at age 65 is a reduction from $36,500 per annum to $36,000 per annum, or less than $10 a week.
Comparing expected to desired retirement income will give funds and advisers an offering that investors will be engaged with and change the way they see their advice provider, the report stated.
"To make it real and give investors something tangible, to get them interested in their superannuation, you have to look ahead to what these savings might achieve," O'Sullivan said.
Recommended for you
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.
An adviser has received a written reprimand from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after failing to meet his CPD requirements, the panel’s first action since June.
While efficiency remains a top priority for Australian advisers, State Street has revealed the profession is now juggling this desire with the need to maintain personalisation of its service offering.
A possible acquisition of data provider Iress is becoming a greater likelihood after the firm announced it is engaging with multiple interested parties.
