Super splitting laws passed

superannuation contributions association of superannuation funds superannuation funds amp financial services assistant treasurer IFSA government

12 December 2005
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

Australian couples will now be able to split their superannuation contributions after January 1, 2006, with legislation ratifying the move passed by the Senate.

Under the new laws a fund member will be allowed to request, at the end of the financial year, that his or her previous year’s superannuation contributions be split with their spouse. The option will only apply to accumulation interests and will be a voluntary measure for superannuation funds.

Women and non-working spouses are two groups set to benefit from the legislation that will effectively make superannuation available for people outside of the workforce.

“The splitting of superannuation contributions will assist many families and will be of particular benefit to women,” Assistant Treasurer Mal Brough said.

“Splitting will allow non-working spouses to have superannuation assets under their own control and to have their own income in retirement,” he added.

AMP Financial Services managing director Craig Dunn agreed women would be better off under the new rules.

“This is a welcome boost, especially for women, whose superannuation balances are usually significantly lower than that of their male counterparts,” he said.

The change to the superannuation laws carry with them considerable tax benefits, with couples now being able to access two reasonable benefit limits and two eligible termination payment tax free thresholds.

The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) welcomed the passing of the legislation as it allows couples to approach their retirement savings together.

“We know most couples approach retirement planning together, so it makes sense to allow a couple to better balance their superannuation contributions. Now they can plan their superannuation together,” IFSA deputy chief executive John O’Shaughnessy said.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) also welcomed the move even though it would have preferred a different model be used.

“We would have preferred even more for there to be a split of benefits at the end on the basis of simplicity, less administration, and delivering the greatest benefit for fund members, but it’s certainly welcome what the Government did do,” ASFA principal researcher Ross Clare said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS