Super regulation ‘inconsistent and confusing’

superannuation-funds/compliance/disclosure/super-funds/director/risk-management/

4 July 2008
| By Internal |

The “inconsistent” regulatory rules relating to the superannuation environment are impacting on the level of protection available to super fund members.

Russell Investments director of fiduciary research Scott Donald has called on super funds to go beyond the industry’s “sometimes inconsistent and confusing regulatory scheme” to ensure members’ interests are adequately protected.

Speaking at the Superannuation Researchers Colloquium at the University of New South Wales, Donald said that along with the growth of superannuation as a savings vehicle had arrived a “bewildering tapestry of laws, regulations and general law principles”.

Donald believes that superannuation laws contain “fundamental inconsistencies in the characterisation of members of superannuation funds as alternatively beneficiaries, employees, customers, investors, or even, given the important public policy elements of superannuation, as citizens”.

“In an ideal world, these rules would all emanate from a single, cohesive, and coherent set of assumptions,” Donald said.

“Regrettably, far from being an ideal world, these different characterisations implicitly reflect different assumptions about the level and type of protection that members deserve.”

Donald referred to the differences between the “protective, paternalistic rhetoric of ‘trust’, ‘trustee’ and ‘beneficiary’ and the individualistic, self-sufficiency of ‘product’ and ‘consumer’”.

According to Donald, these differences “fundamentally affect the types and levels of protections available to [super fund] members”.

“The ‘box-ticking’ compliance culture seen in the areas of risk management and disclosure in the industry, in particular, needs to be wound back in favour of a focus on what is material and an assessment of how that relates to the interests of members,” Donald said.

“Superannuation is too important to individual members, and to the economy as a whole, for the industry to forget this basic message.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 4 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

1 week 6 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND