Super regulation ‘inconsistent and confusing’

superannuation-funds/compliance/disclosure/super-funds/director/risk-management/

4 July 2008
| By Internal |

The “inconsistent” regulatory rules relating to the superannuation environment are impacting on the level of protection available to super fund members.

Russell Investments director of fiduciary research Scott Donald has called on super funds to go beyond the industry’s “sometimes inconsistent and confusing regulatory scheme” to ensure members’ interests are adequately protected.

Speaking at the Superannuation Researchers Colloquium at the University of New South Wales, Donald said that along with the growth of superannuation as a savings vehicle had arrived a “bewildering tapestry of laws, regulations and general law principles”.

Donald believes that superannuation laws contain “fundamental inconsistencies in the characterisation of members of superannuation funds as alternatively beneficiaries, employees, customers, investors, or even, given the important public policy elements of superannuation, as citizens”.

“In an ideal world, these rules would all emanate from a single, cohesive, and coherent set of assumptions,” Donald said.

“Regrettably, far from being an ideal world, these different characterisations implicitly reflect different assumptions about the level and type of protection that members deserve.”

Donald referred to the differences between the “protective, paternalistic rhetoric of ‘trust’, ‘trustee’ and ‘beneficiary’ and the individualistic, self-sufficiency of ‘product’ and ‘consumer’”.

According to Donald, these differences “fundamentally affect the types and levels of protections available to [super fund] members”.

“The ‘box-ticking’ compliance culture seen in the areas of risk management and disclosure in the industry, in particular, needs to be wound back in favour of a focus on what is material and an assessment of how that relates to the interests of members,” Donald said.

“Superannuation is too important to individual members, and to the economy as a whole, for the industry to forget this basic message.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks 1 day ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS