Super funds meet objectives, but fall down on communication
While 94 per cent of superannuation funds have met their investment objectives over the last five years, less than a quarter had clearly defined and measurable benchmarks for their members.
A recent survey from Super Ratings analysed the performance of superannuation options against their stated objectives. Most funds set their objectives over a medium term period of four to five years, and notwithstanding recent market downturns, the study found the majority of funds have delivered to members, remaining ahead of their stated performance objectives.
Furthermore, approximately half of the superannuation options continued to meet or exceed their objectives over the medium to long term of seven years.
However, the research also found that only 24 per cent made their objectives easy for members to understand while 75 per cent of fund options provided “ill-defined investment objectives to consumers” and were subsequently eliminated from the study.
Super Ratings acknowledged there were no clear requirements for superannuation funds to provide measurable objectives to their members. The research centre is calling for “identically defined ‘investment objectives’” within funds’ Product Disclosure Statements.
AUTHOR
Amal Awad
Recommended for you
Wealth Data has examined which advice business model has seen the most growth since the start of the year including those that offer holistic advice.
Research conducted by Elixir Consulting and Lonsec has quantified the efficiency gains of using managed accounts in financial advice practices in hours per week saved.
With only one-quarter of advice practices actively seeking feedback from clients, the Financial Advice Association Australia has emphasised why this is a critical tool for client retention.
As the government announces a public inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory, risk adviser Richard Silberman has detailed the three areas that typically lead to an AFSL's collapse.
