Super funds meet objectives, but fall down on communication
While 94 per cent of superannuation funds have met their investment objectives over the last five years, less than a quarter had clearly defined and measurable benchmarks for their members.
A recent survey from Super Ratings analysed the performance of superannuation options against their stated objectives. Most funds set their objectives over a medium term period of four to five years, and notwithstanding recent market downturns, the study found the majority of funds have delivered to members, remaining ahead of their stated performance objectives.
Furthermore, approximately half of the superannuation options continued to meet or exceed their objectives over the medium to long term of seven years.
However, the research also found that only 24 per cent made their objectives easy for members to understand while 75 per cent of fund options provided “ill-defined investment objectives to consumers” and were subsequently eliminated from the study.
Super Ratings acknowledged there were no clear requirements for superannuation funds to provide measurable objectives to their members. The research centre is calling for “identically defined ‘investment objectives’” within funds’ Product Disclosure Statements.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
