Super choice changes ease burden on employers

compliance/government/assistant-treasurer/

24 January 2005
| By George Liondis |

Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer Mal Brough has sought to reassure employers that they will not be unnecessarily burdened by choice of fund requirements, including excusing some from having to choose a default fund for their employees.

With the countdown to the July 1 start date for super choice on in earnest, Brough said the choice legislation would be altered to exempt some employers — those who require workers to pick a fund as a condition of employment — from having to assign a default fund.

The current rules require all employers to have in place a default fund in case employees fail to choose their own fund.

“Some employers have never had to select a default fund as all of their employees are required to choose a fund as a condition of employment,” Brough said in a statement.

“The current choice legislation requires these employers to now select a default fund and advise their employees of its existence, imposing unnecessary compliance costs of business given that employees have already exercised choice. The Government will legislate to exempt these employers from choosing a default fund.”

Brough also reassured employers that they would be able to reject an employee’s choice if the chosen fund required that the company becomes a ‘participating employer’.

Some funds require companies to become ‘participating employers’ before they accept contributions, a move Brough said would impose undue obligations on employers, including the possibility that they would have to make more regular super payments.

“I can reassure employers that the choice legislation in no way compels them to become a participating employer,” Brough said.

“Employees can only choose a fund which will accept contributions from their employer at the time the employee chooses that fund. A fund which requires the employer to become a participating employer before they will accept contributions does not satisfy this requirement.”

However, Brough warned employers that they could not charge employees for any added costs associated with choice of fund.

He said charging employees would discourage them from making a choice and undermine the Government’s policy.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS