Super choice changes ease burden on employers

compliance government assistant treasurer

24 January 2005
| By George Liondis |

Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer Mal Brough has sought to reassure employers that they will not be unnecessarily burdened by choice of fund requirements, including excusing some from having to choose a default fund for their employees.

With the countdown to the July 1 start date for super choice on in earnest, Brough said the choice legislation would be altered to exempt some employers — those who require workers to pick a fund as a condition of employment — from having to assign a default fund.

The current rules require all employers to have in place a default fund in case employees fail to choose their own fund.

“Some employers have never had to select a default fund as all of their employees are required to choose a fund as a condition of employment,” Brough said in a statement.

“The current choice legislation requires these employers to now select a default fund and advise their employees of its existence, imposing unnecessary compliance costs of business given that employees have already exercised choice. The Government will legislate to exempt these employers from choosing a default fund.”

Brough also reassured employers that they would be able to reject an employee’s choice if the chosen fund required that the company becomes a ‘participating employer’.

Some funds require companies to become ‘participating employers’ before they accept contributions, a move Brough said would impose undue obligations on employers, including the possibility that they would have to make more regular super payments.

“I can reassure employers that the choice legislation in no way compels them to become a participating employer,” Brough said.

“Employees can only choose a fund which will accept contributions from their employer at the time the employee chooses that fund. A fund which requires the employer to become a participating employer before they will accept contributions does not satisfy this requirement.”

However, Brough warned employers that they could not charge employees for any added costs associated with choice of fund.

He said charging employees would discourage them from making a choice and undermine the Government’s policy.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 days 20 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

6 days ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

5 days 3 hours ago