The struggle to incorporate ESG into portfolios
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88536/885364c5fcb543f79fa9367a69e724fd355a1c67" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88536/885364c5fcb543f79fa9367a69e724fd355a1c67" alt="image"
Advisers face challenges when it comes to assessing the ESG characteristics of unlisted assets as the industry lacks a consistent standard.
Speaking at the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia (RIAA) conference in Sydney, Gillian Gordon, head of alternative investments and responsible investing (RI) at JBWere, said there were difficulties once investors moved away from listed equities.
“The challenge we have as an adviser industry is you can have many, many different funds and how do you compare and contrast them? There’s no consistent industry standard that every fund manager adopts.
“Each fund can report separately but as soon as you get a new fund or a new geographic, that’s a real challenge to compare and that’s something that has to be solved,” she said.
“It’s really easy for listed equities, finding information in fixed income is pretty good but as you go into alternatives, that’s pretty bad. You can get the data really well on the listed side but not great on the unlisted side, it becomes harder outside of listed equities.”
A ‘nirvana’ for her, she said, would be the ability to see the RI characteristics across a client’s whole portfolio, the same way as she could see their financial returns.
“The challenge the industry faces is to how do you get enough data to see that level of information to make an informed decision and give them that transparency?
“Nirvana for me would be producing a client report of their whole portfolio and seeing the return, risk and RI characteristics across the entire portfolio, I want to be able to see the whole thing. The industry is trying to get there but unfortunately we are not there yet.”
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.