Structured products disclosure under scrutiny
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has updated its disclosure guidance for capital protected products and retail structured or derivative products marketed to retail investors.
The report is a result of a program started by ASIC in January 2009 and has involved the review of 64 Product Disclosure Statements for adequacy of disclosure.
In its review, ASIC focused on capital protected products as it believed investors might be attracted to these investments due to a perception of capital safety without fully comprehending the inherent risks. It also examined structured and derivative products marketed to retail investors where associated risks and costs might not be anticipated or understood.
Following the review, ASIC has made recommendations that issuers of these products should make more effective disclosure to prospective investors by clearly explaining counterparty risk and by including supporting financial information to ensure retail investors can assess the issuer’s financial ability to meet its counterparty obligations.
Further recommendations saw issuers of capital protected products urged to ensure disclosure is sufficient so that investors can assess the likelihood of early termination or any other significant limitations of these products. It also stressed issuers provide better disclosure costs that may apply should an investor seek to terminate or redeem a product before its maturity date.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
